Skip to main content
Download PDF

Antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella isolates from human diarrhea cases in China: an eight-year surveilance study

One Health Advances volume 1, Article number: 2 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Salmonella is widely known as one of the most common foodborne pathogens, and antibiotics remain effective in clinical therapies against its infections. To guide better clinical antibiotic treatment, we analyzed the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles of a nation-wide collection of 36,822 Salmonella isolates derived from sporadic diarrhea cases in China from 2014 to 2021. A panel of 15 antibiotics, including 10 critically important and 5 highly important antimicrobial agents for human medicine based on the WHO CIA List, was selected for AMR surveillance. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, Enteritidis, I 4,[5],12:i:-, London, and Stanley were turns to be the top five serotypes from human diarrhea cases in China. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing revealed that the majority of the isolates (87.2%) were resistant to at least one antimicrobial agent, and 66.5% were multidrug resistant (MDR). Salmonella isolates were found to be highly resistant to ampicillin (73.4%) while sensitive to imipenem (98.73%). Over the eight years, the isolates were demonstrated generally an increase in resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and azithromycin, but displayed varied resistance profiles in terms of serotypes. Stanley (0.66–27.18%) and Agona (0.78–45.30%) had lower resistance rates compared to Typhimurium (1.11–85.6%), Enteritidis (1.55–91.29%), and I 4,[5],12:i:- (1.02–94.28%). In conclusion, our results provide systematic data on the resistance characteristics of Salmonella isolates from human diarrhea cases in China. Furthermore, this data identifies priorities for the clinical treatments of antibiotics.

Introduction

Foodborne diseases continue to be a significant cause of human morbidity and mortality worldwide. Among the 22 common foodborne diseases, nontyphoidal Salmonella enterica causes the highest burden [1]. In China, data from national foodborne disease surveillance revealed that Salmonella was among the top three pathogenic causes of bacterial foodborne outbreaks [2]. The isolation rate of Salmonella from sporadic diarrheal cases was highest among the four major bacterial pathogens (Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Salmonella, diarrheagenic Escherichia coli, and Shigella) in the foodborne disease active surveillance [3].

Outbreaks associated with resistant Salmonella are frequently reported worldwide [4]. In China, to monitor trends of antimicrobial susceptibility among foodborne pathogens, AMR surveillance has been included in the National Foodborne Disease Surveillance Plan since 2014. All 32 Chinese provincial CDC laboratories are required to conduct antimicrobial susceptibility tests (ASTs) and submit the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to the National Molecular Tracing Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (TraNet) [5]. The China National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment (CFSA) manages and analyzes all AMR data and reports it to the National Health Commission annually.

This study, provides the first summary of AMR data for 36,822 Salmonella isolates from sporadic diarrhea cases between 2014 and 2021 in China. Additionally, we analyzed the trends and changes of AMR and serotype in these isolates during an eight-year period. The data presented herein would provide better evidence to support clinicians and policy-makers during their clinical therapies and efforts to combat Salmonella infections.

Results

Geographic distribution

From 2014 to 2021, a total of 31 Chinese provincial CDCs reported the MICs of 36,822 Salmonella isolates derived from human sporadic diarrhea cases to the CFSA. The number of isolates reported by each province varied from 91 in Chongqing to 9,174 in Guangdong (Fig. 1). 7,766 isolates were reported by 16 northern provinces, and 29,056 isolates were reported by 15 southern provinces.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Year (A) and geographical (B) distribution of 36,822 Salmonella isolates from sporadic diarrhea cases in China, 2014–2021. * Provinces in blue font belong to northern China, and provinces in red font belong to southern China

Full size image

Serotype distribution

During the eight years, 94.0% (34,631/36,822) of the isolates were serotyped. A total of 466 serotypes were detected, and S. Typhimurium, Enteritidis, I 4,[5],12:i:-, London, Stanley, Derby, Rissen, Thompson, Agona, and Goldcoast were the top 10 serotypes among sporadic clinical isolates in China (Table 1). The distribution of serotypes exhibited regional differences. Enteritidis (39.7%, 3,082/7,766) was the most dominant serotype in northern China; however, in southern China, Typhimurium and I 4,[5],12:i:- (47.1%, 13,699/29,056) were the most prevalent serotypes.

Table 1 Serotype distribution of 34,631 Salmonella isolates from sporadic cases, 2014–2021, China
Full size table

Antimicrobial resistance

Of the 36,822 isolates, 87.2% (32,102/36,822) were resistant to at least one antimicrobial agent, and 66.5% (24,478/36,822) were MDR strains. A total of 73.4% (26,560/36,822) were resistant to ampicillin, while only 1.3% isolates (432/36,822) showed resistance to imipenem (Fig. 2). Among all MDR isolates, 53.9% (13,194/24,478) exhibited resistance to over five classes of antimicrobial agents.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Resistance profile of Salmonella isolates from sporadic cases, 2014–2021, China

Full size image

A total of 1,814 AMR profiles were determined, and 1,701 were MDR profiles. The ACSuT profile (resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, sulfonamide, and tetracycline) and ACSuTAs profile (ACSuT plus ampicillin/sulbactam) were the two most common MDR profiles, accounting for 25.1% (9,247/36,882) and 16.7% (6,170/36,882) of Salmonella isolates, respectively. The most common serotypes with the ACSuT profile were Typhimurium (n = 4,372), I 4,[5],12:i:-(n = 1,135), and London (n = 690).

The trend analysis based on the linear regression model showed that the isolates exhibited upward resistance trends to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and azithromycin, and the resistance rates increased by 2.2%, 1.8%, 1.7%, and 0.4% for each additional year, respectively. While decreasing resistance rates were observed for gentamicin, nalidixic acid, and ciprofloxacin, with the resistance rates decreasing by 1.4%, 1.1% and 0.6% for each additional year, respectively. Resistance to colistin E decreased from 27.5% in 2019 to 15.9% in 2021 (Fig. 3); however, three-year data could not fit the linear regression model to conduct statistical tests.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Resistance rates of 36,822 Salmonella isolates to 15 antimicrobial agents by year

Full size image

The AMR of Salmonella isolates varied among serotypes, with significant differences in resistance rates and MDR rates were observed. For instance, S. Stanley and S. Agona had lower resistance rates than S. Typhimurium, I 4,[5],12:i:-, Enteritidis, and London (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Antimicrobial resistance of top 10 Salmonella serotypes

Full size image

Salmonella isolates that were categorized as intermediate (0.125–0.5 µg/mL) or resistant (MIC ≥ 1 µg/mL) to ciprofloxacin were previously defined as having decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (DSC) [6]. Although 16.2% of the tested isolates showed resistance to ciprofloxacin, 70.5% had DSC, as 54.3% of isolates were intermediate to ciprofloxacin. S. Enteritidis was the most common serotype among the top 10 Salmonella serotypes with DSC, and 92.4% (7,278/7,877) of S. Enteritidis isolates had DSC. S. Typhimurium (5.4%, 661/12,331), S. London (35.6%, 435/1,221), and I 4,[5],12:i:- (7.3%, 243/3,341) were the most common serotypes with resistance to azithromycin. Only 6.4% (28/439) of typhoidal Salmonella isolates (S. typhi, S. paratyphi A, S. paratyphi B, and S. paratyphi C) were resistant to azithromycin. The resistance rate of Salmonella isolates to third-generation cephalosporins was 19.3%. The percentages of resistance to ceftazidime and cefotaxime were 10.4% and 19.1%, respectively, indicating the production of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) among these resistant isolates. The most common serotypes of these cephalosporin-resistant isolates were Typhimurium (n = 2,830), I 4,[5],12:i:-(n = 997) and Enteritidis (n = 871). 1.27% of isolates showed resistance to imipenem, Typhimurium, and I 4,[5],12: i:being the most common Salmonella serotypes, accounting for 30.1% and 26.2% of imipenem-resistant isolates, respectively.

Discussion

The global burden of AMR has led to triggered the development of coordinated national and global action plans [7, 8]. Increasingly, governments around the world have launched and strengthened AMR surveillance programs in both animals and humans [9,10,11,12,13]. In China, the AMR surveillance program for animals was launched in 2008 and for humans in 2005 [14]. In 2014, AMR surveillance for foodborne pathogens from human diarrhea cases was launched. The main goal of the AMR surveillance program in TraNet was to track the trend in antibiotic resistance of selected foodborne pathogens, identify important resistance patterns, and assess the effect of interventions. This is the first time that the Chinese human diarrhea surveillance data has been officially released.

Fluoroquinolones, third-generation cephalosporins, and macrolides are commonly used to treat human Salmonella infections. Over 70% of human Salmonella isolates had decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, and the proportion was far higher than the 5.8% shown by the NARMS in the US [15]. Enteritidis was the most common serotype in both China and the US, a high proportion (> 90%) of human Enteritidis isolates with DSC collected in this study indicated that ciprofloxacin may be unsuitable for the treatment of Enteritidis infection in China. A similar resistance rate to ciprofloxacin were observed in Salmonella isolates from China (16.2%) and EU (14.1%) [16]. Moreover, 39.8% of the tested Salmonella isolates with DSC were susceptible to nalidixic acid, implying a high presence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) in human Salmonella infections [15].The use of fluoroquinolones may further facilitate the transmission of PMQR determinants in patients during treatment. Nearly 20% of human Salmonella isolates from diarrhea cases were resistant to third-generation cephalosporins in China, and the resistant proportion was much higher than that in the US (2.7%) and EU (0.8%). However, no upward trend in resistance to third-generation cephalosporins was observed in this study, indicating that these antimicrobials are still effective for the treatment of most Salmonella infections. Resistance to third-generation cephalosporins is mainly mediated by ESBLs and AmpC-type β-lactamases. blaCTX-M was the most prevalent gene among partial ESBL-producing Salmonella isolates in China, according to the whole-genome sequencing (WGS) analysis (unpublished data). Although it is still unclear to what extent isolates with ESBL from animals are directly responsible for human infections, some countries have placed voluntary restrictions on the use of these critically important antimicrobials for disease prophylaxis in food-producing animal husbandry under the One Health perspective [17, 18]. It should be noted that the rate of human azithromycin-resistant Salmonella isolates (7.9%) in China was not only higher than that reported in the US and EU (< 1%), but also showed a gradual upward trend, suggesting that a prudent use of azithromycin is urgently needed in the treatment of Salmonella infections in Chinese clinical settings.

Another important aim of TraNet is to assess the effectiveness of interventions. Previous studies have shown that restricting the use of  antibiotics in food-producing animals is associated with a reduction in antibiotic-resistant bacteria in both animals and humans [19, 20]. Our surveillance data also indicated a downward resistant trend in colistin resistance in Salmonella isolates from diarrhea cases. This decrease further demonstrates that the ban on colistin as an animal growth promoter in 2017 had a significant effect on reducing colistin resistance in bacteria of human origin, which is consistent with the decreasing colistin resistance of E. coli from animals and humans in China after the colistin withdrawal policy was implemented [20, 21]. Therefore, continuous surveillance is necessary for early warning of emerging AMR in human foodborne pathogens in hospital settings.

AMR varies by serotypes in different countries/regions. The serotype distribution of sporadic human isolates in China was similar to that in the EU (top 3: Enteritidis, Typhimurium, and I 4,[5],12:i:-,), but different from that in the US (top 3: Enteritidis, Newport, and Typhimurium). Even within China, Enteritidis was the most prevalent serotype in the north of China, whereas Typhimurium and I 4,[5],12:i:- were the dominant serotypes in the south of China. This difference in serotype distribution might be partly explained by dietary and consumption habits or climatic factors. Recent research in China has revealed the dominant mobile genetic elements accounting for the transmission of MDR I 4,[5],12:i:-, providing evidence for addressing the spread of AMR pathogen [22]. Given the interconnections of AMR amongst the environment, animals, and humans, a national integrated surveillance system across different sectors is needed to better understand the ecology of resistant bacteria, implement evidence-based control measures, and promote effective stewardship.

Limitations

We acknowledge four limitations of the study. First, all Salmonella isolates were cultured from selected sentinel hospitals in China, and only a fraction of diarrheal cases were sampled in these hospitals, so the conclusions might not fully represent the Salmonella resistance profiles in China. Second, not all isolates were clearly identified due to insufficient data. I 4,[5],12:i:- was underreported in previous years because the second-phase flagellar antigen was not detected. Resistance profiles by different serotypes might have been influenced by this, especially the serovar Typhimurium and I 4,[5],12:i:-. Third, although standard procedures were applied in participating laboratories, the selected antimicrobials and concentration ranges in the panels changed, and not all the isolates were tested against the same antimicrobials. For instance, it was inappropriate to assess the trend of colistin E because of the lack of AST data before 2019. Fourth, WGS analysis, including confirmation of Salmonella serotypes, core genome multilocus sequence typing, and determination of virulent and AMR genes (ARGs), was not used in TraNet to facilitate surveillance until 2019. Isolates collected before 2019 were not subjected to the prediction of ARGs; therefore, this study only focused on phenotypes. There is a need to combine AMR testing and WGS techniques to link the resistance of food and human isolates.

Conclusion

We described an eight-year dataset of the AMR profile of Salmonella isolates from active foodborne disease in China, and found that Salmonella AMR varied by serotype. Although the isolates displayed downward resistance trends to nalidixic acid, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, and colistin, the resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and azithromycin presented upward trends. Compared with the surveillance data in the US and EU, the resistance profiles in human Salmonella isolates in China suggest that prudent use of antibiotics for treating Salmonella-caused foodborne diseases is needed.

Materials and methods

Human Salmonella Isolates

Based on the national foodborne disease surveillance plan in China, sentinel hospitals were chosen by each provincial health administration to conduct laboratory-based active foodborne disease surveillance. At least 10 stool specimens per hospital every month were collected from sporadic diarrheal cases to identify the five most common foodborne pathogens, including Salmonella species, Shigella species, Vibrio. parahaemolyticus, DEC, and norovirus. According to the guidelines and techniques of the national foodborne disease surveillance manual, all isolates were ultimately sent to provincial CDCs for final identification, molecular subtyping, and AMR testing. Then, provincial CDC laboratories were instructed to submit the epidemiological information and experimental data of isolates to the CFSA via TraNet. In this study, all Salmonella isolates were derived from sporadic diarrhea cases under the framework of active foodborne disease surveillance, and isolates from foodborne outbreaks were not included.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST)

The broth microdilution method was applied to test the antimicrobial susceptibility in participating TraNet laboratories. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommended antibiotics and commonly used antibiotics in clinical therapy. A panel of 15 antibiotic agentsfrom 11 classes was selected for surveillance, including ampicillin, ampicillin/sulbactam, cefazolin cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefoxitin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, gentamicin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, imipenem, and colistin. All antibiotics were grouped into critically important and highly important antimicrobials based on the World Health Organization (WHO) List of Critically Important Antimicrobials for Human Medicine (WHO CIA List) [23] (Table 2). The MIC for each antimicrobial was used to categorize isolates as susceptible, intermediate (if applicable) or resistant based on CLSI M100-S32 clinical breakpoints. Escherichia coli ATCC 25,922 was included to ensure the reliability and reproducibility of AST.

Table 2 Antimicrobial agents used for susceptibility testing of Salmonella isolates, 2014–2021
Full size table

Data analysis

All reported data were audited and checked and then exported and managed using Microsoft Excel 2016. All variable values were reported as counts or percentages (%). Statistical analyses, such as resistance rate, MDR profile, and resistance trend analysis based on a linear regression model, were conducted with R version 4.1.2. Isolates that were resistant to at least one of the tested antimicrobials were considered resistant isolates, and MDR was defined as “resistance to three or more classes of antimicrobials”.

References

  1. Kirk MD, Pires SM, Black RE, Caipo M, Crump JA, Devleesschauwer B, et al. World health organization estimates of the global and regional disease burden of 22 foodborne bacterial, protozoal, and viral diseases, 2010: a data synthesis. PLoS Med. 2015;12(12):e1001921. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001921.

  2. Li W, Pires SM, Liu Z, Ma X, liang J, Jiang Y, et al. Surveillance of foodborne disease outbreaks in china, 2003–2017. Food Control. 2020;118:107359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107359.

  3. Liu J, Bai L, Li W, Han H, Fu P, Ma X, et al. Trends of foodborne diseases in China: lessons from laboratory-based surveillance since 2011. Front Med. 2018;12:48–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-017-0608-6.

  4. Larkin L, Pardos de la Gandara M, Hoban A, Pulford C, Jourdan-Da Silva N, de Valk H, et al. Investigation of an international outbreak of multidrug-resistant monophasic Salmonella Typhimurium associated with chocolate products, EU/EEA and United Kingdom, February to April 2022. Euro Surveill. 2022;27:15. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.15.2200314. Accessed 13 Sept 2022.

  5. Li W, Cui Q, Bai L, Fu P, Han H, Liu J, et al. Application of whole-genome sequencing in the national molecular tracing network for foodborne disease surveillance in China. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2021;18(8):538–46. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2020.2908.

  6. Campbell D, Tagg K, Bicknese A, McCullough A, Chen J, Karp BE, et al. Identification and characterization of Salmonella enterica serotype newport isolates with decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62:7. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00653-18.

  7. Commission E. A European one health action plan against antimicrobial resistance (AMR). https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2020-01/amr_2017_action-plan_0.pdf. Accessed 13 Sept 2022.

  8. WHO. Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance. https://www.afro.who.int/sites/default/files/2017-05/global-action-plan-on-antimicrobial-resistance.pdf. Accessed 13 Sept 2022.

  9. Karp BE, Tate H, Plumblee JR, Dessai U, Whichard JM, Thacker EL, et al. National antimicrobial resistance monitoring system: two decades of advancing public health through integrated surveillance of antimicrobial resistance. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2017;14(10):545–57. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2017.2283.

  10. Otto SJG, Haworth-Brockman M, Miazga-Rodriguez M, Wierzbowski A, Saxinger LM. Integrated surveillance of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use: evaluation of the status in Canada (2014–2019). Can J Public Health. 2022;113(1):11–22. https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-021-00600-w.

  11. Pillonetto M, Jordao RTS, Andraus GS, Bergamo R, Rocha FB, Onishi MC, et al. The experience of implementing a national antimicrobial resistance surveillance system in Brazil. Front Public Health. 2020;8:575536. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.575536.

  12. Schrijver R, Stijntjes M, Rodriguez-Bano J, Tacconelli E, Babu Rajendran N, Voss A. Review of antimicrobial resistance surveillance programmes in livestock and meat in EU with focus on humans. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24(6):577–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2017.09.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Veeraraghavan B, Walia K. Antimicrobial susceptibility profile & resistance mechanisms of global antimicrobial resistance surveillance system (GLASS) priority pathogens from India. Indian J Med Res. 2019;149(2):87–96. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_214_18.

  14. Hu F, Zhu D, Wang F, Wang M. Current status and trends of antibacterial resistance in China. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67(suppl_2):S128–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy657.

  15. CDC. National antimicrobial resistance monitoring system for Enteric Bacteria (NARMS): 2015 human isolates surveillance report. https://www.cdc.gov/narms/pdf/2015-NARMS-Annual-Report-cleared_508.pdf. Accessed 13 Sept 2022.

  16. EFSA, ECDC. The European Union summary report on antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2019–2020. Sci Rep. 2022;20(3):e07209. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7209.

  17. Dutil L, Irwin R, Finley R, Ng LK, Avery B, Boerlin P, et al. Ceftiofur resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg from chicken meat and humans, Canada. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;16(1):48–54. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1601.090729.

  18. Hiki M, Kawanishi M, Abo H, Kojima A, Koike R, Hamamoto S, et al. Decreased resistance to broad-spectrum cephalosporin in Escherichia coli from healthy broilers at farms in Japan after voluntary withdrawal of ceftiofur. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2015;12(7):639–43. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2015.1960.

  19. Tang KL, Caffrey N, Nobrega DB, Cork SC, Ronksley PE, Barkema HW, et al. Restricting the use of antibiotics in foodproducing animals and its associations with antibiotic resistance in food-producing animals and human beings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Planet Health. 2017;1(8):e316–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30141-9.

  20. Wang Y, Xu C, Zhang R, Chen Y, Shen Y, Hu F, et al. Changes in colistin resistance and mcr-1 abundance in Escherichia coli of animal and human origins following the ban of colistin-positive additives in China: an epidemiological comparative study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(10):1161–1171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30149-3.

  21. Liu YY, Wang Y, Walsh TR, Yi LX, Zhang R, Spencer J, et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(2):161–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00424-7.

  22. Mu Y, Li R, Du P, Zhang P, Li Y, Cui S, et al. Genomic epidemiology of ST34 monophasic Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium from clinical patients from 2008 to 2017 in Henan, China. Engineering. 2022;15(8):34–44.

  23. WHO. Critically important antimicrobials for human medicine : 6th revision. Switzerland: WHO; 2019.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the invaluable contribution of all members in participant hospitals and CDCs for their dedication to foodborne disease surveillance in China. All authors conceived and participated in the paper design and coordination. This research was supported by The National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant number 2022YFC2303900).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NHC Key Laboratory of Food Safety Risk Assessment, Food Safety Research Unit (2019RU014) of Chinese Academy of Medical Science National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment, 37 Guangqu Road, Chaoyang District, 100022, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

    Weiwei Li, Haihong Han, Jikai Liu & Yunchang Guo

  2. Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China

    Bixia Ke

  3. Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Hangzhou, China

    Li Zhan

  4. Sichuan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chengdu, China

    Xiaorong Yang

  5. Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, China

    Dongmei Tan

  6. Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, China

    Bo Yu

  7. Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China

    Xiang Huo

  8. Beijing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China

    Xiaochen Ma & Tongyu Wang

  9. Hunan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changsha, China

    Shuai Chen

  10. Anhui Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hefei, China

    Yong Sun

  11. Fujian Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Fuzhou, China

    Weiwei Chen

  12. Henan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou, China

    Yanfen Li

  13. Jiangxi Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanchang, China

    Chengwei Liu

  14. Yunnan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Kunming, China

    Zushun Yang

Authors
  1. Weiwei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Haihong Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jikai Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bixia Ke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Li Zhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiaorong Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Dongmei Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Bo Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xiang Huo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Xiaochen Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Tongyu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Shuai Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Yong Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Weiwei Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Yanfen Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Chengwei Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Zushun Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Yunchang Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

W.L. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; H.H. reviewed the data; J.L. designed the experiments; B.K., L.Z., X.Y., D.T., B.Y., X.H., X.M., S.C., Y.S., W.C., Y.L., C.L., Z.Y., performed the experiments and submitted the data; T.W. conducted statistical analysis; Y.G. conceived and managed the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunchang Guo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to paricipate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have declared that no conflicts of interest exist.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, W., Han, H., Liu, J. et al. Antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella isolates from human diarrhea cases in China: an eight-year surveilance study. One Health Adv. 1, 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s44280-023-00001-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s44280-023-00001-3

Keywords

One Health Advances

ISSN: 2731-9970

Contact us